Posts Tagged ‘decriminalizing marijuana’

Diverse Coalition Fuels Maine’s Medical Marijuana Progress

maine marijuana

Maine’s medical marijuana laws — wrought by activists and enshrined by legislative Democrats — got a boost from conservatives last week when Gov. Paul LePage signed a bill liberalizing the state’s policy.

L.D. 1296, “An Act To Amend the Maine Medical Use of Marijuana Act To Protect Patient Privacy,” sponsored by Rep. Deborah Sanderson, R-Chelsea, eliminates the mandate that patients register with the state.

Sanderson’s bill also eliminates mandatory disclosure to the state of a patient’s specific medical condition.

When the law takes effect, patients will need only tote physicians’ recommendations on tamper-proof paper in case of police intervention instead of the registration cards they carry now, Sanderson said.

She said prescribing doctors’ contact information will have to be placed on the card.

Caregivers — people patients entrust with providing them marijuana — still have to register with the Maine Department of Health and Human Services.

Sanderson said the bill’s main focus was privacy.

“One of the reasons many patients don’t want to register is that they’re sensitive about their conditions,” Sanderson said. “They also don’t want the federal government to gain access to that database. That fear is legitimate.”

eric holder marijuana

In 2009, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder directed federal prosecutors not to prosecute marijuana users who conform with state medical marijuana laws. But in 2011, federal prosecutors wrote letters to officials in Arizona, Colorado, Montana, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington, directing them not to liberalize medical marijuana laws.

Rep. Benjamin Chipman, a Portland independent, said federal policy “makes no sense.”

“I don’t think we need to be worried about what the federal government has going on,” he said. “We’re in the Capitol to make state law, and that’s what we’re doing.”

Sanderson’s bill passed easily without any roll call votes. But those on opposite sides of the issue — law enforcement and caregivers — have doubts about how the new law will work.

Robert Rosso, a Gardiner caregiver who founded a co-op of growers and patients, called the recent amendments “good and bad” — good for privacy, perhaps bad for patient security.

“There are a lot of those older patients who have that old-school mentality and want to stay off the books,” he said. “But, when you’re on that list and you’re pulled over (with marijuana), the police can see you’re legit and let you go.”

Rosso said he’ll maintain his registration with the state as “added security.”

Waterville Police Chief Joseph Massey said the law is part of “an effort to be very liberal with the dispense of marijuana.”

“We are law enforcement,” Massey said. “As law enforcement officials trying to enforce law, if we ask for reasonable information, we should get that.”

Medical Marijuana

As to the new medical marijuana amendments, Massey said: “We are often on the side of privacy and confidentiality to the detriment of public safety.”

Massey said he is opposed to any liberalization of marijuana, whether total legalization or for medical use.

He said he has seen cases where those with state authorization have used marijuana in public.

“When I have a prescription, I’m not using it out in the open,” he said. “The law is overwhelmingly for illegal uses by people who will now use [marijuana] legally.”

Sanderson said she didn’t anticipate any problems enforcing the law, but that personal motives can’t ever be policed.

“Are there going to be people who abuse this?” she said. “Yes. You find that with everything.”

Of the nine co-sponsors of Sanderson’s bill, eight are Republican; one, Chipman, is unenrolled.

Chipman, who represents Portland’s Parkside, Bayside and East Bayside neighborhoods, said police shouldn’t be focused on marijuana crimes.

“I come from a district where we have major crime issues,” he said. “It seems like there’s bigger and better things to worry about.”

LePage signed the bill June 24, saying in a statement: “I am pleased that the Legislature has voted to move the law closer to the initiated bill that was enacted by the voters. I am proud to a sign a bill that protects patient privacy and respects the will of the voters.”

James Melcher, a professor of political science at the University of Maine at Farmington, said conservative backing of the bill may be peculiar to those in “red states” but isn’t terribly surprising coming from Maine Republicans who have long blasted overregulation by Democratic leadership.

“It shows you’ve got this libertarian sentiment in the Republican Party in Maine,” Melcher said. “Sometimes, the best politics are when people you don’t expect come together on things.”

Melcher said the expansion of medical marijuana here isn’t shocking, as advocates “have done a good job making patients very human. They’ve become a hard group to oppose.”

Sanderson, who said she voted against the successful 2009 medical marijuana referendum that led to her bill, has now changed her tune.

“I think it’s a human issue. You have folks out there that are really ill,” she said. “I was wrong in stigmatizing the use of this.”

Michael Shepherd — 621-5662

mshepherd@mainetoday.com

Article From Kennebec Journal

Kentucky’s Lower Penalities For Marijuana Now in Effect

l.jpeg
Graphic: Sheree Krider

​Kentucky, long known as a state where excellent marijuana is grown, has lowered its penalties for possession of up to eight ounces of the herb, effective Friday, June 24.

Back in March the Kentucky Legislature overwhelmingly passed (97-2 in the House; 38-0 in the Senate) House Bill 463, which was then signed into law by Governor Steve Bershear. The new law reduces the penalty for personal possession of up to eight ounces of pot to a Class B misdemeanor, carrying a maximum penalty of 45 days in jail.
But don’t get too carried away; those penalties are just for first offenses. Subsequent offenses with up to eight ounces are still felonies, for which you can get up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000, according to the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML).

It appears that individuals solely accused of marijuana possession, less than eight ounces, will normally be cited — not arrested — under HB 463, according to the Marijuana Policy Project. If there are reasonable grounds to believe the individual will appear in court, the law provides that people may not arrest people for misdemeanors.
There are a few exceptions, but those should not apply when the only charge is marijuana possession and the defendant follows “reasonable instructions,” according to MPP.
The new law is expected to save Kentucky’s taxpayers up to $422 million over the next 10 years by making it no longer necessary to prosecute and jail low-risk cannabis offenders. It also reinvests some of those savings into treatment options for those needing help, reports Mickey Martin at West Coast Leaf.
Currently, one-fourth of Kentucky’s prisoners are serving time for drug-related offenses. HB 463 was based on the recommendations of a report by the Task Force on the Penal Code and Controlled Substances Act, which was created to find cheaper alternatives to incarceration.
Historically, it has been really easy to get your ass busted in Kentucky. In fact, the Bluegrass State is tied for third in the nation in marijuana arrest rates and, until the new law came into effect on June 24, for marijuana penalties for possession of one ounce.
Kentucky arrested a whopping 20,329 people for marijuana offenses in 2007.

CT Senate Decriminalizes Marijuana Possession

Afer five hours of debate, on Tuesday Connecticut became the 13th state in the Union to decriminalize marijuana. The state’s House of Representatives passed new legislation and Governor Dan Malloy is expected to sign off on it.
The House voted 90 to 57 in favor of SB 1014.
According to the new rules first-time offenders caught in possession of less than a half-ounce of pot will be hit with a 150 ticket; repeat offenders would get at least $200 but a maximum of 500 per offense. If you’re under 21, you’ll get a two-month suspension of your driver’s license.
“Final approval of this legislation accepts the reality that the current law does more harm than good — both in the impact it has on people’s lives and the burden it places on police, prosecutors and probation officers of the criminal justice system,” Malloy said in the statement.
State Sen. Toni Boucher (R-Wilton) in a statement on her website said that decriminalization sends the wrong message to the state’s youth about the risks of marijuana use.
“What kind of message does this send to our children?” Senator Boucher said in the statement. “This law undermines a fundamental lesson that our schools, social service programs and parents teach our children: that taking drugs is bad for you.”
Connecticut’s non-partisan Office of Fiscal Analysis however estimates the bill will save the state nearly $1 million in court costs and attorney salaries and net upwards of $1.4 million in new fines and fees.

read more: http://www.thcfinder.com/marijuana-blog/legalization/2011/06/ct-senate-decriminalizes-marijuana-possession#ixzz1Ou3YnfIL

Massachusettes Court: Odor Of Pot Not Enough To Order Suspect To Exit Car

n159100227_30026603_13661.jpeg
Photo: Flawless Hustle

Yes, I know what the car smells like, officer.
Maybe you haven’t heard about the decision from the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts.

Huge Victory In Massachusetts Limits Police Power
It’s a logical outcome of decrim, and it finally happened today. The mere odor of burning marijuana is no longer reason enough for police officers to order a person out of their car in Massachusetts, now that possession of less than an ounce of pot has been decriminalized there, the state’s highest court ruled on Tuesday.

“Without at least some other additional fact to bolster a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, the odor of burnt marijuana alone cannot reasonably provide suspicion of criminal activity to justify an exit order,” the Supreme Judicial Court ruled in a decision written by Chief Justice Roderick Ireland, reports Martin Finucane at the Boston Globe.

RoderickNEW226.jpeg
Photo: News @ Northeastern
I like this guy: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Chief Justice Roderick Ireland
According to the court, the people’s intent in passing a ballot question which decriminalized possession of small amounts of cannabis was “clear: possession of one ounce or less of marijuana should not be considered a serious infraction worthy of criminal sanction.”
“Ferreting out decriminalized conduct with the same fervor associated with the pursuit of serious criminal conduct is neither desired by the public not in accord with the plain language of the statute,” the court ruled.
In a long-overdue triumph of logic, the court ruled that the change in the law should — you guessed it! — affect how police behave in the field.
Justice Judith Cowin, who has since retired, wrote a dissent in the 5-1 decision. She wrote that up until this ruling, Massachusetts state law has allowed police to perform a warrantless search if they smelled burnt marijuana in a car.
“Even though possession of a small amount of marijuana is now no longer criminal, it may serve as the basis for a reasonable suspicion that activities involving marijuana, that are indeed criminal, are underway,” she wrote in a torturous example of non-logic.
“Our case law is clear that ‘the odor of marijuana is sufficiently distinctive that it alone can supply probable cause to believe that marijuana is nearby,’ ” Cowin wrote.
“The advent of decriminalization certainly has had no effect on the distinctiveness of marijuana’s odor. Nor has decriminalization affected the criminal status of numerous other activities involving marijuana,” she wrote, inadvertently revealing that her fevered imagination around what those potheads must be doing is a lot keener than is her shaky legal acumen.
Massachusetts voters in November 2008 overwhelmingly approved Question 2, which decriminalized marijuana, with backers calling for a “more sensible approach” to marijuana laws and asking law enforcement to focus on more serious and violent crimes.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 111 other followers

%d bloggers like this: